Comments on: Exploit status for MS08-067 http://www.spylogic.net/2008/10/exploit-status-for-ms08-067/ Sun, 18 Sep 2011 21:48:21 +0000 hourly 1 By: GregFeezel http://www.spylogic.net/2008/10/exploit-status-for-ms08-067/comment-page-1/#comment-103 GregFeezel Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:12:21 +0000 #comment-103 I tested Gimmiv.A in my lab and it did show worm-like behaviors however did not exploit another test victim on the same network. Looking at some of the code and strings there are definitely worm-like features that either arent turned on in the variant I tested or not working...yet. I tested Gimmiv.A in my lab and it did show worm-like behaviors however did not exploit another test victim on the same network. Looking at some of the code and strings there are definitely worm-like features that either arent turned on in the variant I tested or not working…yet.

]]> By: Nathan http://www.spylogic.net/2008/10/exploit-status-for-ms08-067/comment-page-1/#comment-102 Nathan Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:36:14 +0000 #comment-102 <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/958963.mspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/te...</a> http://www.microsoft.com/te…

]]> By: Eliot http://www.spylogic.net/2008/10/exploit-status-for-ms08-067/comment-page-1/#comment-101 Eliot Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:29:09 +0000 #comment-101 Tom, you should add that link to the post at the bottom with an "UPDATED:"<br /> <br /> Thanks for the Gimmiv.A info! Tom, you should add that link to the post at the bottom with an "UPDATED:"

Thanks for the Gimmiv.A info!

]]> By: Tom http://www.spylogic.net/2008/10/exploit-status-for-ms08-067/comment-page-1/#comment-100 Tom Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:33:09 +0000 #comment-100 Right after I posted this... :-)<br /> <br /> <a href="https://metasploit.com/ms08_067_netapi.rb" rel="nofollow">https://metasploit.com/ms08...</a> Right after I posted this… :-)

https://metasploit.com/ms08…

]]>