<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Winlockpwn: More then a Partytrick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spylogic.net/2008/05/winlockpwn-more-then-a-partytrick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spylogic.net/2008/05/winlockpwn-more-then-a-partytrick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 21:48:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raven Poh</title>
		<link>http://www.spylogic.net/2008/05/winlockpwn-more-then-a-partytrick/comment-page-1/#comment-2169</link>
		<dc:creator>Raven Poh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2169</guid>
		<description>I had a question on the winlockpwn script and hope that someone could help me out.  Is it possible to use a USB to firewire cable to link from Linux VM to WinXP SP2 machine Or it is a necessary that we need a linux machine with firewire in order for the winlockpwn script to work.

The Linux VM will be running the winlockpwn script and the attacked machine is WinXP SP2. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a question on the winlockpwn script and hope that someone could help me out.  Is it possible to use a USB to firewire cable to link from Linux VM to WinXP SP2 machine Or it is a necessary that we need a linux machine with firewire in order for the winlockpwn script to work.</p>
<p>The Linux VM will be running the winlockpwn script and the attacked machine is WinXP SP2. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mule</title>
		<link>http://www.spylogic.net/2008/05/winlockpwn-more-then-a-partytrick/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know how to get past a &quot;Permission Denied&quot; error when &quot;./winlockpwn 0 1 2&quot; is entered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know how to get past a &quot;Permission Denied&quot; error when &quot;./winlockpwn 0 1 2&quot; is entered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.spylogic.net/2008/05/winlockpwn-more-then-a-partytrick/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 23:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Thanks for testing this Jim.  I would assume that it&#039;s only a matter of time until the code is rewritten to support XP sp3 (unless MSFT found a way to prevent it from working).  I&#039;ll keep everyone updated on any developments I find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for testing this Jim.  I would assume that it&#8217;s only a matter of time until the code is rewritten to support XP sp3 (unless MSFT found a way to prevent it from working).  I&#8217;ll keep everyone updated on any developments I find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim blanford</title>
		<link>http://www.spylogic.net/2008/05/winlockpwn-more-then-a-partytrick/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>jim blanford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 22:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-36</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m guessing this doesn&#039;t work on XP SP3.  I just followed your tutorial on an XP SP3 machine and it was a no/go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing this doesn&#8217;t work on XP SP3.  I just followed your tutorial on an XP SP3 machine and it was a no/go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.spylogic.net/2008/05/winlockpwn-more-then-a-partytrick/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I would think it would work from 4-pin to 6-pin.  I have seen 4-pin 1394 connectors on some laptops.  I have also seen 4-pin to 6-pin adapters that you can buy in case you only have a 6-pin to 6-pin cable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think it would work from 4-pin to 6-pin.  I have seen 4-pin 1394 connectors on some laptops.  I have also seen 4-pin to 6-pin adapters that you can buy in case you only have a 6-pin to 6-pin cable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim blanford</title>
		<link>http://www.spylogic.net/2008/05/winlockpwn-more-then-a-partytrick/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>jim blanford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 23:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Will this work with a 4 pin to 6 pin IEEE 1394 cable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will this work with a 4 pin to 6 pin IEEE 1394 cable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.spylogic.net/2008/05/winlockpwn-more-then-a-partytrick/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Tyler.  I found something similar that was done in the past for OS X called &quot;FireStarter&quot;.  This hack would apparently overwrite the memory of another Mac connected by FireWire.  I believe this was fixed in newer versions of OS X from what I have read.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was also another hack where you could connect a Mac to a FreeBSB box w/FireWire and do some interesting things.  Looks like both of these hacks are really old (2004 and earlier).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.23.nu/RedTeam/stories/5201/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.23.nu/RedTeam/...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Tyler.  I found something similar that was done in the past for OS X called &quot;FireStarter&quot;.  This hack would apparently overwrite the memory of another Mac connected by FireWire.  I believe this was fixed in newer versions of OS X from what I have read.</p>
<p>There was also another hack where you could connect a Mac to a FreeBSB box w/FireWire and do some interesting things.  Looks like both of these hacks are really old (2004 and earlier).</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.23.nu/RedTeam/stories/5201/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.23.nu/RedTeam/&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.spylogic.net/2008/05/winlockpwn-more-then-a-partytrick/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 10:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Hey baby, wanna see my firewire?  :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Great entry!  Given that firewire requires direct access to memory of a computer in order to work, do you think this hack could be performed on other OS&#039;?  Using different attacks scripts of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey baby, wanna see my firewire?  <img src='http://www.spylogic.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Great entry!  Given that firewire requires direct access to memory of a computer in order to work, do you think this hack could be performed on other OS&#8217;?  Using different attacks scripts of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

